| 001 / If your idea is wrong, would you like to know? | Original question with YES / LATER tear-offs. Conceptual link to Popper's conjecture-and-criticism account. | No exact wording claimed. The question concerns an explanation, not general dissatisfaction with the world. |
| 002 / Utopia is still in committee. You may begin without it. | Original administrative adaptation of Deutsch's post on voluntary, bottom-up progress, inspected during the editorial research. | Does not reject coordination or planning. The notice expressly allows working together. |
| 003 / This explanation is 200 years old. Happy birthday. | Original birthday-card joke. General connection to the criticism of explanations in BoI. | No line-level quotation source. Old knowledge can be excellent; novelty is no warrant either. |
| 004 / “We don’t know how” doesn’t mean “it can’t be done”. | Original plain-language adaptation of the distinction between a missing method and a demonstrated limit in the BoI synopsis. | The two quoted sentences are illustrative speech, not Deutsch quotations. Not a guarantee that a particular project is possible. |
| 005 / Your plan requires perfect people. We have the regular ones. | Original institutional joke about fallibility. No verified line-level source is claimed. | Conceptual, not a Popper quotation. Plans need room for ordinary mistakes and correction. |
| 006 / Optimism is not a guarantee. | Original adaptation of the account of optimism in the official BoI synopsis and glossary. The synopsis says problems are soluble; the final line keeps knowledge creation and action necessary. | All problems can be solved distinguishes possibility from guaranteed success. It does not promise a particular outcome or timetable, or mean that arbitrary tasks can violate the laws of physics. This is DOEC wording, not a verbatim Deutsch quotation. |
| 007 / Please attack the idea. It doesn't have a nervous system. | Original play on Popper's distinction between people and their conjectures. Related discussion: Natural Selection and the Emergence of Mind, Dialectica 32 (1978), p. 354. | Our wording is not a quotation. Criticise the claim and its reasons; do not threaten its owner. |
| 008 / “All swans are white.” “I have some notes.” | Original black-swan cartoon using the familiar universal-claim counterexample. Dialogue is our own; no copied meme art. | Quotation marks mark dialogue in the illustration, not attribution to Popper. A counterexample itself can require scrutiny. |
| 009 / Experts can be wrong. This does not make me right. | Original formulation about fallibility and the burden of explanation. No verified line-level source is claimed. | Rejects a free pass for competing claims, not expertise itself. |
| 010 / Did you argue with me here? | Original poster by Closscraft Labs; typography-first adapted recreation issued by Closscraft Labs from an assistant-produced transcription and visual description of images supplied by their author, 3 November 2026. Reuse, adaptation and copying authorized. | Source images were not available in this separate task. Red condensed heading, CCTV photograph, arrows, “You” / “Me, Albert”, CAM03 and 16:47:32 overlay omitted. Black system typography replaces the original colour treatment. Supplied phone number retained without investigating its owner. |
| 011 / Please take a side | Original poster by Closscraft Labs; typography-first adapted recreation issued by Closscraft Labs from an assistant-produced transcription and visual description of images supplied by their author, 3 November 2026. Reuse, adaptation and copying authorized. | Source images were not available in this separate task. Apartment photograph and blue bar omitted. Alternating AGAINST / FOR tabs and record-keeping text retained. Neither recreation is a pixel-exact import; no photograph is copied or generated. |
| 012 / This idea comes unassembled. | Original assembly-notice metaphor adapted from Deutsch's account of understanding in his August 2011 KERA Think interview with Krys Boyd. Deutsch's own bibliography links Josh Jordan's transcript. In the exchange about whether another civilisation could explain things to us, Deutsch describes the listener creating an idea by guessing the meaning and using the speaker's words to criticise and improve that guess. | All poster wording and dialogue are original adaptations, not quotations. The interview heard by the requester has not been identified. The assembly metaphor concerns creating understanding, not mechanically following a recipe. Knowledge can be new to the listener without being new to humanity. Questions, examples and better explanations help; responsibility for communication is shared. Understanding does not require agreement. |